Print PDF
 

MediaWiki

MediaWiki

Product Information

Type Downloadable
Belongs to categories Wiki Engines Content Management Systems

Vendor Information

Product Administrator Magnus Manske, Brion Vibber, Lee Daniel Crocker, Tim Starling, Erik Muller

License

License Type Freeware
License Name GNU General Public License

Advanced Information

Languages English
Programming Language OCamlPHP
MediaWiki is one of the most used wiki software application and it can be used as a content management system too. First was written for Wikipedia but is now is used to other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation and many other sites. The last version brings features like undo revision, improvements to blocking and page caching, tables with sortable columns, edit counter field and revision size displayed on recent changes.

User reviews

View all user reviews

Average user rating from: 7 user(s)

Overall rating: 
 
4.5
Functionality:
 
4.9   (7)
Usability:
 
4.2   (7)
Security:
 
4.3   (7)
Performance & Scalability:
 
4.7   (7)
Architecture & Quality:
 
4.7   (7)
Support & Documentation:
 
4.4   (7)
Adoption & Community:
 
4.4   (7)
 
Ratings (the higher the better)
Functionality*
Usability*
Security*
Performance & Scalability*
Architecture & Quality*
Support & Documentation*
Adoption & Community*
Pros and Cons
Comments*
    Please enter the security code.
 
 

The mighty MediaWiki

Overall rating: 
 
4.8
Functionality:
 
5.0
Usability:
 
4.0
Security:
 
4.0
Performance & Scalability:
 
5.0
Architecture & Quality:
 
5.0
Support & Documentation:
 
5.0
Adoption & Community:
 
5.0
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

We've recently installed MediaWiki to set up a nice knowledge base for our internal use (for ITerating project). It's a powerful engine and it works great for keeping in one place specs, proposals, discussions on new ideas and features.

The Upload Image interface could have been placed better as it is difficult to add new images while editing. Also, something that I find funny, although it allows different files to be uploaded, they're all under the tag "Image".

One more thing I have to say, its PHP class structure and code are just beautiful !!

 

The leader, but could be better

Overall rating: 
 
4.3
Functionality:
 
5.0
Usability:
 
2.0
Security:
 
4.0
Performance & Scalability:
 
5.0
Architecture & Quality:
 
5.0
Support & Documentation:
 
4.0
Adoption & Community:
 
4.0
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes No
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

MediaWiki powers wikipedia, which has helped establish it as the leading wiki platform.
Mediawiki has definitely proven its realiability and scalability. Yes, it could be much easier to use, and much easier to customize. It seems that the development efforts are focused on supporting wikipedia, now you average user in search of a great wiki.

 

Best wiki

Overall rating: 
 
4.2
Functionality:
 
5.0
Usability:
 
4.0
Security:
 
4.0
Performance & Scalability:
 
4.0
Architecture & Quality:
 
4.0
Support & Documentation:
 
3.0
Adoption & Community:
 
3.0
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes No
Reviewed by Guest
February 17, 2007
Comments (0)
Report this review
 
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

This is definitely the best wiki around but although initial setup is intuitive skinning MediaWiki is not. Documentation is lacking in some areas. If you have experience with wikis, this is the one to go for. For new users though, set up is a challenge. Take care when reading the help and tips as many of these are out of date.

 

Amazing!

Overall rating: 
 
5.0
Functionality:
 
5.0
Usability:
 
5.0
Security:
 
5.0
Performance & Scalability:
 
5.0
Architecture & Quality:
 
5.0
Support & Documentation:
 
5.0
Adoption & Community:
 
5.0
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful

MediaWiki is an amazing piece of software, it's open source, stable, powerful and very very useful. I always got great support over the mailing lists or IRC channel. It has so many features yet it's so easy to customize. What could one expect since Wikipedia uses it for such a long time? I wouldn't recommend it to an amateur though since it wasn't designed for small setups.
Still, there are a couple of items on my features wish list, like a simpler WYSIWYG editor or the possibility to use your own skins.

 

The wiki of the wikis

Overall rating: 
 
3.9
Functionality:
 
4.0
Usability:
 
4.0
Security:
 
3.0
Performance & Scalability:
 
4.0
Architecture & Quality:
 
4.0
Support & Documentation:
 
4.0
Adoption & Community:
 
4.0
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

Yes ... pretty much it's what it is. After trying a bunch of wiki implementations, I went for MediaWiki and never looked back :)

 
 
View all user reviews
Comments
Add New
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."