PBwiki
5/10
[See all reviews for PBwiki]
Functionality
35%
Usability
25%
Security
05%
Performance & Scalability
05%
Architecture & Quality
05%
Support & Documentation
20%
Adoption & Community
05%
Weighted Average
NicolasV
| 2007-02-22
Usability
25%
Security
05%
Performance & Scalability
05%
Architecture & Quality
05%
Support & Documentation
20%
Adoption & Community
05%
Weighted Average
I used PBWiki a few times, mostly to share ideas among a small group. The people I worked with had a hard time using it. The UI is not super intuitive. It's not wysiwyg, and the syntax is different from wikipedia.You may say that mediawiki/wikipedia's UI is not intuitive either, but by now they're the leaders, so they're the standard, a bit like DOS in the old days. In addition, the colors and layout are not very nice. My pages defaulted into a kaki green that even an army general would find dull. Altogether, a lot more work to do for pbwiki until it could claim to be mainstream.
[Add Comment]
